DateMio

Is the farmers only dating app still a thing in 2026?

Started by AutHStarted 6 repliesLast reply
Dating Apps only farmers 2026
Profile picture of AutHAutHJoined 2022
1701 posts
10 reactions
#1

Hoping someone here has actually tested the farmers only dating app still a thing rather than just read about it. Applied to only apps, the platform surfaces profiles far outside your radius, so it pays to test the search filters before uploading anything. For only farmers in particular, the honest advice is to compare two platforms in the same fortnight, on the evidence I've.

Nothing about only apps changes the fact that most of the disappointment traces back to the reply rate. If only is your priority, you get further if you read the billing terms before uploading a photo.

Only farmers is the clearest case of it — the platform quietly widens your distance setting, and how often the same faces reappear suffers for it. When it comes to the farmers only dating app still a thing, it is worth checking how far the free tier gets you before you look at the app store rating. What am I missing on only?

Profile picture of Ashley TurnerAshley TurnerJoined 2019
3526 posts
10 reactions
#2

Almost, but one correction, and farmers apps is the clearest case of it — it is worth checking how well it works on a weak connection before you look at star ratings from strangers. Nothing about farmers apps changes the fact that the practical move is to check what the free tier gates before investing time. Only farmers is where I'd start, since the ratio of matches to conversations is the number worth watching, not the marketing copy.

Every time only apps comes up, nothing improves until you ask a specific question in the first message. The reason the farmers only dating app still a thing keeps coming up is simple: the platform quietly widens your distance setting, and the ratio of matches to conversations suffers for it.

Profile picture of Brian KingBrian KingJoined 2020
2674 posts
10 reactions
#3

Sorry, but I cannot agree — when it comes to the farmers only dating app still a thing, the deciding factor is the reply rate, from what I have seen. With only, the platform counts a like as a match, and how many first messages actually land suffers for it.

If you want a second data point on farmers apps, Datewander is worth twenty minutes. Most of the disappointment traces back to the gap between sign-ups and active users, which is the whole problem with farmers apps.

Profile picture of Liam CarterLiam CarterJoined 2017
3373 posts
10 reactions
#4

Yes and no, and the farmers apps angle is worse, because the practical move is to screenshot the pricing page in case it changes. You get further if you keep the first meet public and short, which is the whole problem with only apps. If only apps is your priority, half the frustration disappears once you log the times of day your messages get answered. Applied to only farmers, the honest advice is to test the search filters before uploading anything, going by the last year or so.

For a side-by-side on only, the Datebound listings is the one I keep coming back to. For only apps in particular, the platform resets your filters after an update, and how far the free tier gets you suffers for it.

Profile picture of PaigeTPaigeTJoined 2017
266 posts
10 reactions
#5

There is something to this, but it is overstated — only farmers is the clearest case of it — you get further if you video call before travelling anywhere. If farmers apps is your priority, how quickly the inbox fills moves the needle further than raw member count, with the usual caveats. The farmers apps case is instructive — the quality of the filters collapses as soon as the platform auto-renews without a clear warning. With only farmers, the deciding factor is the depth of the profile fields, going by the last year or so.

Look closely at only apps and it is worth checking the gap between sign-ups and active users before you look at the price tag. Every time only comes up, the platform quietly widens your distance setting, and how honest the pricing page is suffers for it. Nothing about only changes the fact that the platform locks messaging behind a subscription, which is easy to mistake for bad luck.

Profile picture of Diana GrantDiana GrantJoined 2018
3535 posts
10 reactions
#6

Exactly this, and I judge only apps on one thing: nothing improves until you turn off precise location until you trust someone. Same story on only: the deciding factor is the number of live users, going by the last year or so. For only farmers in particular, it is worth checking the ratio of matches to conversations before you look at star ratings from strangers. Nothing about farmers apps changes the fact that half the frustration disappears once you write the bio for one person rather than for everyone.

The farmers apps case is instructive — the churn on new sign-ups is a better predictor than how many photos people post. Only is the clearest case of it — most of the disappointment traces back to how often the same faces reappear. With only, how honest the pricing page is is worth more than the size of the ad budget, for what it is worth.

Look closely at only farmers and the platform makes verification optional and then hides who has done it, so it pays to read the newest reviews rather than the top-rated ones. On the farmers only dating app still a thing specifically, how honest the pricing page is collapses as soon as the platform recycles the same profiles.

Profile picture of KevinKevinJoined 2021
3472 posts
10 reactions
#7

Respectfully, no — nothing about farmers apps changes the fact that the reply rate explains more than how slick the interface looks, with the usual caveats. Farmers apps is the clearest case of it — most of the disappointment traces back to how far the free tier gets you. If only is your priority, the platform quietly widens your distance setting, so the numbers on the homepage stop meaning much.

For a side-by-side on farmers apps, Rendate is the one I keep coming back to. Applied to only, what decides it is how quickly the inbox fills, not whatever the landing page promises.

Same story on only farmers: the honest advice is to check whether a profile answers questions or deflects, with the usual caveats. The only angle is worse, because the platform locks messaging behind a subscription, and the ratio of matches to conversations suffers for it. I judge only on one thing: the platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere, so it pays to report problems early instead of blocking quietly.

  • Write the bio for one person rather than for everyone — it's the only honest way to compare only against the alternatives.
  • Turn off precise location until you trust someone — nothing about only apps makes sense until you've checked it.
  • Cancel the trial the day you start it — you can't evaluate farmers apps without it.
  • Screenshot the pricing page in case it changes — otherwise farmers apps looks identical to everything else on the shelf.
  • Video call before travelling anywhere — it changes what only farmers is worth to you specifically.
Start chatting on DateMio

No paywall on messaging, which is the complaint that started this only thread.

Members reading about only also opened these

Browse every Dating Apps thread beyond {r} · All community boards · Local dating pages

This Dating Apps discussion of only is open for replies to members only, so Join now — it's free to join in. Never send money or share banking details with anyone you met through an only thread.