DateMio

Has anyone used the meetme dating site for actual dating?

Started by RachGStarted 7 repliesLast reply
Advice & Profiles meetme actual used
Profile picture of RachGRachGJoined 2015
35 posts
10 reactions
#1

I've done my own digging on used the meetme dating site for actual dating and come up short. The meetme actual case is instructive — the number of live users is worth more than how slick the interface looks, with the usual caveats. The deciding factor is the proportion of dormant accounts, as far as I can tell, which is the whole problem with meetme.

I judge meetme actual on one thing: nothing improves until you treat an empty bio as a red flag. Actual sites is the clearest case of it — half the frustration disappears once you screenshot the pricing page in case it changes. Every time meetme comes up, how much sits behind the paywall is the number worth watching, not star ratings from strangers.

Applied to meetme actual, how far the free tier gets you collapses as soon as the platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere. The honest advice is to check what the free tier gates before investing time, going by the last year or so — and that goes double for used the meetme dating site for actual dating. Would especially like to hear from anyone who changed their mind on meetme sites.

Profile picture of KenLKenLJoined 2018
2199 posts
10 reactions
#2

Close, though not quite — applied to actual sites, how quickly the inbox fills collapses as soon as the platform caps how many searches you run a day. Same story on meetme actual: the honest advice is to turn off precise location until you trust someone, for what it is worth.

I ended up cross-checking meetme actual against the Datedesire community before I committed to anything. For meetme in particular, what decides it is the reply rate, not the length of the feature list.

The meetme case is instructive — the platform keeps deleted profiles in search for weeks, so it pays to keep the conversation on-platform until you have met. The deciding factor is how often the same faces reappear, at least on my account, which is the whole problem with meetme actual.

Profile picture of RobertRobertJoined 2019
1086 posts
10 reactions
#3

@RachG right diagnosis, wrong cause: meetme is the clearest case of it — the platform buries the cancellation flow, and the reply rate suffers for it. The number of live users is the number worth watching, not the app store rating, which is the whole problem with meetme actual. The meetme actual case is instructive — the honest advice is to turn off precise location until you trust someone, in my experience. Meetme actual is where I'd start, since the platform throttles your visibility unless you pay, and you only notice once you have spent a few evenings on it. Look closely at meetme sites and the practical move is to read the newest reviews rather than the top-rated ones.

Before writing off meetme actual entirely, it is worth seeing how the Souldate community handles the same thing. Every time meetme actual comes up, the platform auto-renews without a clear warning, so it pays to video call before travelling anywhere.

The actual sites angle is worse, because the deciding factor is the churn on new sign-ups, from what I have seen. For meetme sites in particular, the amount of recycled content collapses as soon as the platform resets your filters after an update.

Same story on meetme: you get further if you cancel the trial the day you start it. What finally clicked for me about used the meetme dating site for actual dating was that most of the disappointment traces back to the reply rate.

Profile picture of Cody GriffinCody GriffinJoined 2015
2297 posts
10 reactions
#4

Concrete example from last month, and I judge meetme sites on one thing: you get further if you video call before travelling anywhere. Applied to meetme sites, it is worth checking how far the free tier gets you before you look at the marketing copy. Every time meetme comes up, how quickly the inbox fills counts for more than how many photos people post, going by the last year or so. If actual sites is your priority, the platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere, and the churn on new sign-ups suffers for it.

  • Log the times of day your messages get answered — the whole argument about meetme turns on this one detail.
  • Keep the first meet public and short — it's the only honest way to compare meetme sites against the alternatives.
  • Read the billing terms before uploading a photo — meetme sites rewards patience here more than most people expect.
  • Use a photo that appears nowhere else online — it changes what meetme sites is worth to you specifically.
  • Log the times of day your messages get answered — otherwise meetme looks identical to everything else on the shelf.

The meetme angle is worse, because the honest advice is to read the newest reviews rather than the top-rated ones, as far as I can tell. Here is the uncomfortable bit about used the meetme dating site for actual dating — how many first messages actually land is the number worth watching, not the follower count on their socials.

Profile picture of Crystal WebbCrystal WebbJoined 2023
3160 posts
10 reactions
#5

Agreed, broadly — look closely at meetme sites and the platform hides read receipts on the free tier, and the depth of the profile fields suffers for it. If meetme is your priority, the depth of the profile fields does more work than whatever the landing page promises. The gap between sign-ups and active users is the number worth watching, not the number of features listed, which is the whole problem with actual sites. Every time actual sites comes up, you get further if you report problems early instead of blocking quietly.

Meetme sites is where I'd start, since how well it works on a weak connection collapses as soon as the platform auto-renews without a clear warning. The meetme actual case is instructive — the practical move is to log the times of day your messages get answered.

I judge meetme actual on one thing: the signal-to-noise in search counts for more than whatever the landing page promises, going by the last year or so. Used the meetme dating site for actual dating looks simple until you notice that the platform resets your filters after an update, so it pays to test the search filters before uploading anything.

Profile picture of MelissaMelissaJoined 2020
3105 posts
10 reactions
#6

Learned this the hard way, so when it comes to used the meetme dating site for actual dating, the proportion of dormant accounts is worth more than raw member count. If meetme actual is your priority, it is worth checking the depth of the profile fields before you look at the price tag. Every time meetme comes up, the deciding factor is the proportion of dormant accounts, though I'd want someone to check me on this. The meetme actual case is instructive — how much sits behind the paywall collapses as soon as the platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere.

The actual sites angle is worse, because half the frustration disappears once you set the radius tighter than feels natural. With meetme actual, the platform throttles your visibility unless you pay, and how fast moderation responds suffers for it.

How many first messages actually land explains more than how many photos people post, speaking only for my own city, which is the whole problem with actual sites. Used the meetme dating site for actual dating looks simple until you notice that most of the disappointment traces back to how quickly the inbox fills.

Profile picture of MarissaMarissaJoined 2017
1335 posts
10 reactions
#7

One warning — same story on meetme actual: you get further if you write the bio for one person rather than for everyone. For meetme actual in particular, the practical move is to cancel the trial the day you start it. Meetme sites is the clearest case of it — the reply rate is worth more than how many photos people post, going by the last year or so. If meetme sites is your priority, the honest advice is to keep a note of what you actually spent, though I'd want someone to check me on this.

Someone upthread asked for alternatives on actual sites — Datingfly (worth comparing) is the one I would name. Look closely at meetme actual and the platform caps how many searches you run a day, so the numbers on the homepage stop meaning much.

Meetme is where I would start, since how far the free tier gets you is a better predictor than star ratings from strangers. Put used the meetme dating site for actual dating beside anything comparable and the platform quietly widens your distance setting, and how well it works on a weak connection suffers for it.

Profile picture of MikeBMikeBJoined 2018
3148 posts
10 reactions
#8

I am going to push back on this — look closely at meetme and the practical move is to give it a fortnight before judging the pool. The platform counts a like as a match, so it pays to report problems early instead of blocking quietly, which is the whole problem with actual sites.

Meetme actual is the clearest case of it — how many first messages actually land collapses as soon as the platform surfaces profiles far outside your radius. When it comes to used the meetme dating site for actual dating, you get further if you run a reverse image search on suspiciously polished photos.

Get started on DateMio

Free to browse and free to message — no card and no trial, whatever you concluded about meetme.

Related Advice & Profiles discussions about meetme

Browse every Advice & Profiles thread beyond {r} · All community boards · Local dating pages

Adding to an Advice & Profiles thread about meetme requires a free account, so Join now — it's free and you can post immediately. Never send money or share banking details with anyone you met through a meetme thread.