DateMio

Has anyone used the lucky date app?

Started by RyanMStarted 7 repliesLast reply
Dating Apps lucky date used
Profile picture of RyanMRyanMJoined 2017
1130 posts
10 reactions
#1

Trying to get a straight answer on used the lucky date app without the marketing spin. Lucky is where I'd start, since what decides it is how much sits behind the paywall, not the marketing copy. The lucky case is instructive — most of the disappointment traces back to how much sits behind the paywall.

If lucky is your priority, you get further if you keep the first meet public and short. The date apps angle is worse, because half the frustration disappears once you cancel the trial the day you start it. With date apps, nothing improves until you compare two platforms in the same fortnight.

Lucky date is the clearest case of it — it is worth checking the quality of the filters before you look at the price tag. When it comes to used the lucky date app, the deciding factor is the gap between sign-ups and active users, from what I have seen. Numbers on lucky appreciated if you kept any.

Profile picture of JamesJamesJoined 2022
173 posts
10 reactions
#2

Worth asking: nothing about lucky apps changes the fact that the ratio of matches to conversations collapses as soon as the platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere. For lucky in particular, half the frustration disappears once you run a reverse image search on suspiciously polished photos. The lucky case is instructive — the quality of the filters counts for more than the length of the feature list, having tried a handful of these.

Someone upthread asked for alternatives on date apps — Datingfly, of all places is the one I'd name. Every time lucky comes up, the deciding factor is how honest the pricing page is, speaking only for my own city.

Profile picture of DanielleDanielleJoined 2020
1407 posts
10 reactions
#3

Different experience here, and quite different — with lucky, the gap between sign-ups and active users moves the needle further than the follower count on their socials. I judge lucky on one thing: the ratio of matches to conversations tells you more than the length of the feature list, with the usual caveats. For date apps in particular, the honest advice is to ask a specific question in the first message, for what it is worth.

Nothing about lucky date changes the fact that you get further if you treat an empty bio as a red flag. The lucky apps case is instructive — what decides it is how well it works on a weak connection, not the app store rating. Same story on lucky apps: nothing improves until you check whether a profile answers questions or deflects.

Applied to lucky apps, most of the disappointment traces back to the reply rate. The platform recycles the same profiles, so it pays to ask a specific question in the first message — and that goes double for used the lucky date app.

Profile picture of Lily JohnsonLily JohnsonJoined 2019
542 posts
10 reactions
#4

@James that reads backwards to me — if lucky apps is your priority, you get further if you give it a fortnight before judging the pool. I judge lucky on one thing: the ratio of matches to conversations does more work than whatever the landing page promises, though I'd want someone to check me on this. Look closely at date apps and half the frustration disappears once you read the billing terms before uploading a photo.

Lucky apps is where I'd start, since it is worth checking the share of verified profiles before you look at the size of the ad budget. Date apps is the clearest case of it — the platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere, so it pays to keep the first meet public and short.

For lucky date in particular, how often the same faces reappear counts for more than raw member count. There's a pattern with used the lucky date app: the practical move is to keep the first meet public and short.

Profile picture of KevinKevinJoined 2016
373 posts
10 reactions
#5

@Lily learned this the hard way — look closely at lucky apps and the platform locks messaging behind a subscription, so it pays to turn off precise location until you trust someone. Date apps is the clearest case of it — the practical move is to set the radius tighter than feels natural. With lucky date, nothing improves until you keep the conversation on-platform until you have met. The lucky case is instructive — the platform resets your filters after an update, and the share of verified profiles suffers for it.

I ended up cross-checking lucky apps against the Flurrydate community before I committed to anything. The lucky date angle is worse, because you get further if you check whether a profile answers questions or deflects.

Profile picture of Austin ReedAustin ReedJoined 2019
3100 posts
10 reactions
#6

True up to a point – I'd frame used the lucky date app this way: the deciding factor is the quality of the filters, for what it is worth. Applied to lucky, the platform locks messaging behind a subscription, and that is usually where the goodwill runs out. Look closely at lucky date and the ratio of matches to conversations moves the needle further than the size of the database.

Lucky apps is the clearest case of it — how often the same faces reappear is the number worth watching, not the size of the database. I judge date apps on one thing: the honest advice is to ask a specific question in the first message, with the usual caveats.

With lucky date, most of the disappointment traces back to the reply rate. Anyone weighing up used the lucky date app should know that the platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere, so it pays to read the newest reviews rather than the top-rated ones.

Profile picture of TravWTravWJoined 2016
2862 posts
10 reactions
#7

Austin, that hasn't been my experience — that holds in some places and not others: for lucky date in particular, half the frustration disappears once you keep a note of what you actually spent. Same story on lucky apps: what decides it is the amount of recycled content, not the badge on the download page. The platform makes verification optional and then hides who has done it, and the churn on new sign-ups suffers for it, which is the whole problem with lucky date.

Profile picture of StevenStevenJoined 2015
1636 posts
10 reactions
#8

TravW has a point, though one case study, mine — with lucky date, you get further if you report problems early instead of blocking quietly. Lucky is where I'd start, since what decides it is how many first messages actually land, not the marketing copy. Look closely at date apps and nothing improves until you use a photo that appears nowhere else online.

I judge lucky on one thing: the platform quietly widens your distance setting, so it pays to cancel the trial the day you start it. The short version on used the lucky date app is that the honest advice is to give it a fortnight before judging the pool, in my experience.

Join DateMio free

Members here read lucky threads like this one before signing up anywhere.

Keep reading on lucky in Dating Apps

View more Dating Apps threads like this {r} one · All community boards · Browse city pages

Replies on this Dating Apps thread about lucky are open to members, so Join DateMio and message free if you want to add your own experience. Do not move to off-platform payment over lucky, whatever reason is given.