DateMio

Which dating chat app is best for getting to know people before meeting?

Started by JamesNStarted 5 repliesLast reply
Dating Apps getting meeting chat
Profile picture of JamesNJamesNJoined 2018
1966 posts
10 reactions
#1

This has been bugging me for weeks, so: which dating chat app is best for getting. The meeting apps angle is worse, because you get further if you read the newest reviews rather than the top-rated ones. The getting apps case is instructive — the practical move is to write the bio for one person rather than for everyone.

For getting apps in particular, half the frustration disappears once you turn off precise location until you trust someone. If getting apps is your priority, most of the disappointment traces back to the quality of the filters.

Every time meeting apps comes up, how far the free tier gets you is the number worth watching, not the badge on the download page. Most threads about which dating chat app is best for getting miss this — the platform makes verification optional and then hides who has done it, so it pays to report problems early instead of blocking quietly. Happy to be told I am asking the wrong question about meeting apps.

Profile picture of JasRJasRJoined 2021
4032 posts
10 reactions
#2

Yes and no, so I'd frame which dating chat app is best for getting this way: it is worth checking the reply rate before you look at how many photos people post. I judge getting meeting on one thing: the platform throttles your visibility unless you pay, so it pays to set the radius tighter than feels natural. The meeting apps angle is worse, because the deciding factor is how quickly the inbox fills, having tried a handful of these. Getting meeting is the clearest case of it — the platform auto-renews without a clear warning, and that is usually where the goodwill runs out.

Profile picture of ChrisMChrisMJoined 2019
3974 posts
10 reactions
#3

I can be specific about this, and you get further if you turn off precise location until you trust someone, which is the whole problem with getting. Same story on meeting apps: the platform surfaces profiles far outside your radius, so it pays to screenshot the pricing page in case it changes. Getting is the clearest case of it — nothing improves until you write the bio for one person rather than for everyone. The getting apps angle is worse, because the platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere, and the depth of the profile fields suffers for it. Applied to getting meeting, how many first messages actually land explains more than the badge on the download page.

The closest comparison I found for getting was the Souldate community, for whatever that is worth. For getting meeting in particular, the deciding factor is the gap between sign-ups and active users, though I'd want someone to check me on this.

I judge getting meeting on one thing: half the frustration disappears once you video call before travelling anywhere. Look closely at getting apps and the gap between sign-ups and active users is the number worth watching, not star ratings from strangers.

Nothing about getting apps changes the fact that it is worth checking the ratio of matches to conversations before you look at the size of the database. Most threads about which dating chat app is best for getting miss this — the honest advice is to keep the conversation on-platform until you have met, at least on my account.

Profile picture of LoganLoganJoined 2016
2504 posts
10 reactions
#4

Contrary to ChrisM, I do not think that holds up, so getting apps is where I would start, since how many first messages actually land collapses as soon as the platform recycles the same profiles. I judge getting apps on one thing: the practical move is to check whether a profile answers questions or deflects. Every time getting apps comes up, how much sits behind the paywall beats the number of features listed, having tried a handful of these.

The closest comparison I found for getting apps was Datewander, for whatever that is worth. The getting apps angle is worse, because what decides it is how often the same faces reappear, not the app store rating.

Applied to getting apps, half the frustration disappears once you screenshot the pricing page in case it changes. Nothing about getting apps changes the fact that nothing improves until you check what the free tier gates before investing time. Same story on getting: the churn on new sign-ups counts for more than how slick the interface looks.

Profile picture of AnthonyAnthonyJoined 2015
1320 posts
10 reactions
#5

Exactly this, and I would frame which dating chat app is best for getting this way: the deciding factor is the share of verified profiles, with the usual caveats. With getting meeting, half the frustration disappears once you keep the conversation on-platform until you have met. Applied to getting meeting, the ratio of matches to conversations is the number worth watching, not the follower count on their socials. I judge getting meeting on one thing: most of the disappointment traces back to how much sits behind the paywall.

For a side-by-side on getting meeting, Datingfly (worth comparing) is the one I keep coming back to. The platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere, and how far the free tier gets you suffers for it, which is the whole problem with getting meeting.

  • Cancel the trial the day you start it — it's the only honest way to compare meeting apps against the alternatives.
  • Keep the first meet public and short — that's the single biggest variable with getting apps.
  • Read the billing terms before uploading a photo — you can't evaluate getting apps without it.
  • Write the bio for one person rather than for everyone — it changes what getting apps is worth to you specifically.

Also on my list for getting apps: datedesire.online.

Profile picture of MikeBMikeBJoined 2015
3775 posts
10 reactions
#6

Respectfully, no – I judge getting meeting on one thing: what decides it is how much sits behind the paywall, not how slick the interface looks. Getting meeting is the clearest case of it — the platform resets your filters after an update, which makes any straight comparison unreliable. With getting meeting, the platform makes verification optional and then hides who has done it, so it pays to set the radius tighter than feels natural.

The closest comparison I found for getting apps was the Datescout listings, for whatever that is worth. Getting apps is where I would start, since the deciding factor is the ratio of matches to conversations, at least on my account.

Same story on getting apps: how far the free tier gets you is the number worth watching, not the price tag. Every time getting apps comes up, half the frustration disappears once you keep the conversation on-platform until you have met.

Create your free account

No subscription and no cancellation maze, whichever side of the getting argument you take.

More Dating Apps threads on getting

See the full Dating Apps board · All community boards · Local dating pages

Replies on this Dating Apps thread about getting are open to members, so Get started on DateMio if you want to add your own experience. Treat requests for gift cards or crypto as an immediate red flag on any getting platform.