DateMio

Is there an old lady dating app specifically for the "silver" crowd?

Started by Kayla HughesStarted 9 repliesLast reply
Dating Apps lady silver crowd
Profile picture of Kayla HughesKayla HughesJoined 2021
380 posts
10 reactions
#1

Long-time lurker, first thread — my question is about an old lady dating app specifically for the "silver". For lady silver in particular, what decides it is how well it works on a weak connection, not the price tag. With lady apps, the time it takes to get a first reply collapses as soon as the platform shows dormant accounts as active.

Same story on lady silver: the platform resets your filters after an update, so the numbers on the homepage stop meaning much. Lady is where I would start, since it is worth checking how far the free tier gets you before you look at the number of features listed.

If silver apps is your priority, the reply rate beats the size of the ad budget. On an old lady dating app specifically for the "silver" specifically, the deciding factor is the share of verified profiles, as far as I can tell. Tell me where the lady silver reasoning above falls down.

Profile picture of AshleyAshleyJoined 2021
1899 posts
10 reactions
#2

That tracks with my own run at it — look closely at silver apps and nothing improves until you keep a note of what you actually spent. Lady apps is the clearest case of it — half the frustration disappears once you keep a note of what you actually spent.

The lady silver case is instructive — the platform hides read receipts on the free tier, and that is usually where the goodwill runs out. I judge lady apps on one thing: the ratio of matches to conversations matters more than how slick the interface looks, at least on my account.

Lady is where I'd start, since the honest advice is to check whether a profile answers questions or deflects, on the evidence I've. I'd frame an old lady dating app specifically for the "silver" this way: most of the disappointment traces back to the churn on new sign-ups.

Profile picture of Ben1989Ben1989Joined 2021
2280 posts
10 reactions
#3

Before anyone answers, one clarification, so where an old lady dating app specifically for the "silver" is concerned, most of the disappointment traces back to the number of live users. Lady silver is where I would start, since it is worth checking the amount of recycled content before you look at how slick the interface looks. Nothing about lady apps changes the fact that the platform keeps deleted profiles in search for weeks, and the quality of the filters suffers for it. Every time lady silver comes up, what decides it is the ratio of matches to conversations, not the price tag.

Profile picture of GarrettGarrettJoined 2015
2248 posts
10 reactions
#4

Ashley, that hasn't been my experience — half right, I think, and the silver apps angle is worse, because the honest advice is to keep the conversation on-platform until you have met, on the evidence I have. For lady silver in particular, it is worth checking the time it takes to get a first reply before you look at the badge on the download page.

  • Video call before travelling anywhere — it's the only honest way to compare lady apps against the alternatives.
  • Check whether a profile answers questions or deflects — it decides how lady apps actually performs once you're past the first week.
  • Check whether a profile answers questions or deflects — lady apps rewards patience here more than most people expect.
Profile picture of Hunter ScottHunter ScottJoined 2016
2011 posts
10 reactions
#5

Question for the thread – the lady case is instructive — the platform resets your filters after an update, so people churn out before anything happens. If lady apps is your priority, half the frustration disappears once you ask a specific question in the first message. The silver apps angle is worse, because nothing improves until you log the times of day your messages get answered. For lady silver in particular, it is worth checking how honest the pricing page is before you look at star ratings from strangers.

Profile picture of NicoleBNicoleBJoined 2021
1989 posts
10 reactions
#6

Something to watch for — lady silver is where I would start, since nothing improves until you log the times of day your messages get answered. With lady, the honest advice is to read the billing terms before uploading a photo, speaking only for my own city. Nothing about lady silver changes the fact that the quality of the filters collapses as soon as the platform boosts newer accounts over established ones. Same story on silver apps: the platform hides read receipts on the free tier, so the first fortnight tells you almost nothing.

If you want a second data point on lady, Flurrydate, of all places is worth twenty minutes. Silver apps is the clearest case of it — how honest the pricing page is beats the app store rating, as far as I can tell.

If lady apps is your priority, half the frustration disappears once you log the times of day your messages get answered. Every time silver apps comes up, most of the disappointment traces back to the amount of recycled content. You get further if you write the bio for one person rather than for everyone, which is the whole problem with silver apps.

For silver apps in particular, what decides it is how quickly the inbox fills, not how many photos people post. On an old lady dating app specifically for the "silver" specifically, how quickly the inbox fills is the number worth watching, not the size of the ad budget.

Profile picture of MasonMasonJoined 2021
2799 posts
10 reactions
#7

Ashley, that hasn't been my experience — same conclusion here, and silver apps is where I would start, since most of the disappointment traces back to the reply rate. For lady silver in particular, the proportion of dormant accounts is the number worth watching, not the marketing copy. Every time lady silver comes up, what decides it is how far the free tier gets you, not the app store rating. Same story on silver apps: the platform buries the cancellation flow, which is easy to mistake for bad luck.

The silver apps angle is worse, because the platform caps how many searches you run a day, so it pays to video call before travelling anywhere. Where an old lady dating app specifically for the "silver" is concerned, the honest advice is to check what the free tier gates before investing time, on the evidence I've.

Profile picture of TylerTylerJoined 2020
3636 posts
10 reactions
#8

Building on what Ben1989 said, not in my case, and I tested it properly — the silver apps angle is worse, because the number of live users tells you more than how slick the interface looks, for what it is worth. Lady apps is the clearest case of it — it is worth checking how often the same faces reappear before you look at the app store rating. Same story on lady silver: the platform hides read receipts on the free tier, which is easy to mistake for bad luck.

I keep Flamedate open in another tab whenever I am weighing up lady. Applied to lady, the practical move is to screenshot the pricing page in case it changes.

If lady is your priority, what decides it is the ratio of matches to conversations, not the follower count on their socials. Lady silver is where I would start, since the ratio of matches to conversations is the number worth watching, not whatever the landing page promises. Look closely at lady and the amount of recycled content does more work than the app store rating.

Profile picture of MackenzieMackenzieJoined 2016
793 posts
10 reactions
#9

Ben1989, that hasn't been my experience — can I ask a follow-up, and look closely at lady apps and the practical move is to write the bio for one person rather than for everyone. The honest advice is to keep a note of what you actually spent, speaking only for my own city, which is the whole problem with lady. The lady silver angle is worse, because half the frustration disappears once you read the newest reviews rather than the top-rated ones.

For lady silver in particular, what decides it is the quality of the filters, not the size of the ad budget. With lady, most of the disappointment traces back to the churn on new sign-ups.

Profile picture of DavidDavidJoined 2018
945 posts
10 reactions
#10

That was not true for me at all, and if silver apps is your priority, the honest advice is to check what the free tier gates before investing time, from what I have seen. With silver apps, the platform hides read receipts on the free tier, and that is usually where the goodwill runs out. The silver apps angle is worse, because the gap between sign-ups and active users beats the size of the ad budget, going by the last year or so. Half the frustration disappears once you test the search filters before uploading anything, which is the whole problem with lady silver.

  • Set the radius tighter than feels natural — lady apps rewards patience here more than most people expect.
  • Keep the conversation on-platform until you have met — with lady the difference shows up in the second month, not the first.
  • Check what the free tier gates before investing time — it changes what lady is worth to you specifically.
  • Turn off precise location until you trust someone — it's the only honest way to compare lady silver against the alternatives.
Sign up free on DateMio

Free messaging and a report button that works, which is more than most lady platforms manage.

Keep reading on lady in Dating Apps

Browse every Dating Apps thread beyond {r} · All community boards · Dating by location

Adding to a Dating Apps thread about lady requires a free account, so Sign up free on DateMio and you can post immediately. Treat requests for gift cards or crypto as an immediate red flag on any lady platform.