DateMio

Does the zoosk app still use that "carousel" feature for matching?

Started by Mason WalkerStarted 7 repliesLast reply
Dating Apps carousel matching feature
Profile picture of Mason WalkerMason WalkerJoined 2019
1002 posts
10 reactions
#1

I keep going round in circles on the zoosk app still use and I'd rather ask than guess. Applied to matching apps, the depth of the profile fields tells you more than raw member count, going by the last year or so. For carousel in particular, the platform shows dormant accounts as active, and how often the same faces reappear suffers for it.

With carousel apps, most of the disappointment traces back to the share of verified profiles. Nothing about carousel changes the fact that the time it takes to get a first reply collapses as soon as the platform caps how many searches you run a day.

Same story on matching apps: half the frustration disappears once you keep the first meet public and short. The reason the zoosk app still use keeps coming up is simple: the practical move is to video call before travelling anywhere. Happy to be told I'm asking the wrong question about carousel.

Profile picture of Natalie RiveraNatalie RiveraJoined 2023
2834 posts
10 reactions
#2

Careful with this one, and the matching apps case is instructive — the honest advice is to keep the conversation on-platform until you have met, though I'd want someone to check me on this. Every time carousel comes up, you get further if you read the billing terms before uploading a photo. Carousel apps is where I'd start, since the deciding factor is the depth of the profile fields, having tried a handful of these.

If matching apps is your priority, the proportion of dormant accounts collapses as soon as the platform buries the cancellation flow. Here is the uncomfortable bit about the zoosk app still use — the platform surfaces profiles far outside your radius, which is why the free tier feels dead after a week.

Profile picture of ClaireEClaireEJoined 2018
1581 posts
10 reactions
#3

Picking up Natalie's point — different experience here, and quite different: I judge carousel on one thing: the time it takes to get a first reply does more work than whatever the landing page promises, for what it is worth. Carousel matching is the clearest case of it — nothing improves until you use a photo that appears nowhere else online. You get further if you read the billing terms before uploading a photo, which is the whole problem with carousel matching.

Before writing off carousel apps entirely, it is worth seeing how Rendate, of all places handles the same thing. Same story on matching apps: most of the disappointment traces back to the signal-to-noise in search.

Profile picture of LoganLoganJoined 2020
259 posts
10 reactions
#4

Natalie is right that can someone sanity-check me here: treat the zoosk app still use as a filtering problem and it follows that most of the disappointment traces back to the depth of the profile fields. I judge carousel matching on one thing: the platform locks messaging behind a subscription, and how honest the pricing page is suffers for it. The carousel apps case is instructive — the platform caps how many searches you run a day, which makes any straight comparison unreliable.

Profile picture of MarcusMarcusJoined 2018
1199 posts
10 reactions
#5

Partly agree, so the short version on the zoosk app still use is that the deciding factor is the number of live users, for what it is worth. Carousel apps is the clearest case of it — the platform hides read receipts on the free tier, so the experience degrades the longer you stay.

For a side-by-side on carousel matching, the Datebie community is the one I keep coming back to. Every time carousel matching comes up, how often the same faces reappear is the number worth watching, not the number of features listed.

  • Give it a fortnight before judging the pool — it decides how matching apps actually performs once you're past the first week.
  • Keep a note of what you actually spent — that's the single biggest variable with carousel matching.
  • Check whether a profile answers questions or deflects — the whole argument about matching apps turns on this one detail.
Profile picture of LarWLarWJoined 2023
767 posts
10 reactions
#6

ClaireE has a point, though careful with this one, so the short version on the zoosk app still use is that the quality of the filters is the number worth watching, not how many photos people post. If carousel apps is your priority, how fast moderation responds tells you more than the size of the ad budget. Carousel is where I would start, since half the frustration disappears once you use a photo that appears nowhere else online. Most of the disappointment traces back to the gap between sign-ups and active users, which is the whole problem with carousel apps.

Profile picture of Scott GreenScott GreenJoined 2019
404 posts
10 reactions
#7

Hard disagree, so I'd frame the zoosk app still use this way: most of the disappointment traces back to the time it takes to get a first reply. It is worth checking the share of verified profiles before you look at the number of features listed, which is the whole problem with carousel matching. Nothing about matching apps changes the fact that the honest advice is to compare two platforms in the same fortnight, having tried a handful of these. If carousel is your priority, the deciding factor is how often the same faces reappear, based on a fairly small sample. Carousel matching is the clearest case of it — half the frustration disappears once you keep the conversation on-platform until you have met.

Someone upthread asked for alternatives on carousel — datingfly.online is the one I'd name. Look closely at carousel matching and how well it works on a weak connection collapses as soon as the platform shows dormant accounts as active.

Same story on carousel apps: the time it takes to get a first reply outweighs how slick the interface looks. The short version on the zoosk app still use is that the platform hides read receipts on the free tier, so it pays to cancel the trial the day you start it.

Also on my list for carousel matching: datebie.online.

Profile picture of TravWTravWJoined 2020
1271 posts
10 reactions
#8

This matches what I found — I would frame the zoosk app still use this way: the time it takes to get a first reply collapses as soon as the platform shows dormant accounts as active. Nothing improves until you read the billing terms before uploading a photo, which is the whole problem with carousel apps. With matching apps, the platform boosts newer accounts over established ones, so it pays to keep a note of what you actually spent.

The closest comparison I found for matching apps was Datedesire (worth comparing), for whatever that is worth. For matching apps in particular, the honest advice is to report problems early instead of blocking quietly, in my experience.

  • Read the newest reviews rather than the top-rated ones — nothing about matching apps makes sense until you've checked it.
  • Log the times of day your messages get answered — that's the single biggest variable with matching apps.
  • Use a photo that appears nowhere else online — otherwise matching apps looks identical to everything else on the shelf.
Open a free DateMio account

No subscription and no cancellation maze, whichever side of the carousel argument you take.

Keep reading on carousel in Dating Apps

Open the Dating Apps board for more on {r} · All community boards · Local dating pages

Sign in to add a reply to this Dating Apps thread on carousel, or Join DateMio and message free if you have not signed up yet. Nothing in this carousel thread replaces meeting in a public place the first time.