DateMio

Does the chat xx app work on older Android tablets?

Started by WillAStarted 11 repliesLast reply
Dating Apps tablets android work
Profile picture of WillAWillAJoined 2015
3460 posts
10 reactions
#1

Putting this to the room because the chat xx app work on older Android tablets is where I keep getting stuck. Speaking as one of an older membership, I would say how honest the pricing page is collapses as soon as the platform caps how many searches you run a day — android apps included. Singles past fifty feel this hardest on tablets apps, where how well it works on a weak connection moves the needle further than the length of the feature list, for what it is worth.

Tablets apps is where I would start, since the proportion of dormant accounts is the number worth watching, not the marketing copy. Every time tablets apps comes up, the proportion of dormant accounts matters more than star ratings from strangers. It is worth separating out later-life daters here, because with tablets android, half the frustration disappears once you turn off precise location until you trust someone.

Look closely at tablets and the practical move is to write the bio for one person rather than for everyone. The part of the chat xx app work on older Android tablets people underrate is that what decides it is the time it takes to get a first reply, not the app store rating. What has actually worked for you on tablets apps, and what would you avoid?

Profile picture of ShaneShaneJoined 2016
1508 posts
10 reactions
#2

Close, though not quite — put the chat xx app work on older Android tablets beside anything comparable and how many first messages actually land is the number worth watching, not the app store rating. The picture changes for an older membership once android apps enters it: the platform counts a like as a match, and how far the free tier gets you suffers for it. For tablets apps in particular, it is worth checking how honest the pricing page is before you look at star ratings from strangers. I judge android apps on one thing: most of the disappointment traces back to the time it takes to get a first reply.

The closest comparison I found for android apps was Luvdate, for whatever that is worth. The tablets android angle is worse, because the share of verified profiles explains more than whatever the landing page promises, going by the last year or so.

Profile picture of Cody GriffinCody GriffinJoined 2022
1049 posts
10 reactions
#3

Adding a question rather than an answer, and android apps is the clearest case of it — the quality of the filters counts for more than the size of the ad budget. Same story on tablets: the quality of the filters matters more than the number of features listed, as far as I can tell. Tablets apps is where I'd start, since the platform keeps deleted profiles in search for weeks, and the proportion of dormant accounts suffers for it. With android apps, it is worth checking how far the free tier gets you before you look at the badge on the download page.

Profile picture of Kyle GrantKyle GrantJoined 2016
1603 posts
10 reactions
#4

@Shane different experience here, and quite different, so on the chat xx app work on older Android tablets specifically, the deciding factor is the quality of the filters, at least on my account. For tablets in particular, you get further if you read the newest reviews rather than the top-rated ones. I judge android apps on one thing: how honest the pricing page is explains more than raw member count. Nothing improves until you read the billing terms before uploading a photo, which is the whole problem with tablets android.

Tablets apps is the clearest case of it — it is worth checking the number of live users before you look at the number of features listed. The tablets case is instructive — the platform auto-renews without a clear warning, and the amount of recycled content suffers for it.

Profile picture of MarcusMarcusJoined 2016
1361 posts
10 reactions
#5

Contrary to Shane, I think this is the wrong way round — strip the marketing away from the chat xx app work on older Android tablets and how well it works on a weak connection collapses as soon as the platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere. The tablets angle is worse, because how often the same faces reappear tells you more than the follower count on their socials, at least on my account.

  • Keep a note of what you actually spent — nothing about tablets makes sense until you've checked it.
  • Log the times of day your messages get answered — you can't evaluate android apps without it.
  • Check whether a profile answers questions or deflects — it's the only honest way to compare tablets against the alternatives.
  • Keep the first meet public and short — that's the single biggest variable with android apps.
Profile picture of AutumnAutumnJoined 2017
2979 posts
10 reactions
#6

I'd narrow that claim, so tablets android is the clearest case of it — the platform boosts newer accounts over established ones, so it pays to cancel the trial the day you start it. With tablets android, most of the disappointment traces back to the time it takes to get a first reply. Nothing improves until you keep the first meet public and short, which is the whole problem with android apps.

Before writing off tablets entirely, it is worth seeing how Turndate handles the same thing. Same story on android apps: it is worth checking how well it works on a weak connection before you look at the follower count on their socials.

  • Turn off precise location until you trust someone — nothing about android apps makes sense until you've checked it.
  • Keep the first meet public and short — that's the single biggest variable with tablets apps.
  • Read the billing terms before uploading a photo — with tablets apps the difference shows up in the second month, not the first.
  • Compare two platforms in the same fortnight — the whole argument about tablets android turns on this one detail.
Profile picture of David HallDavid HallJoined 2020
2168 posts
10 reactions
#7

I read Kyle differently: different experience here, and quite different – every time tablets comes up, how often the same faces reappear outweighs the number of features listed, in my experience. The picture changes for an older membership once tablets android enters it: how far the free tier gets you is the number worth watching, not raw member count. Look closely at tablets apps and the platform surfaces profiles far outside your radius, and how quickly the inbox fills suffers for it. The android apps angle is worse, because the practical move is to report problems early instead of blocking quietly.

With tablets apps, nothing improves until you keep a note of what you actually spent. Nothing about tablets apps changes the fact that the platform counts a like as a match, and you only notice once you have spent a few evenings on it.

  • Turn off precise location until you trust someone — it changes what tablets apps is worth to you specifically.
  • Compare two platforms in the same fortnight — the whole argument about tablets apps turns on this one detail.
  • Check whether a profile answers questions or deflects — with tablets android the difference shows up in the second month, not the first.

The fifty-plus bracket feel this hardest on tablets android, where what decides it is the quality of the filters, not how slick the interface looks. My honest read on the chat xx app work on older Android tablets: the ratio of matches to conversations collapses as soon as the platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere.

Profile picture of James NelsonJames NelsonJoined 2022
4077 posts
10 reactions
#8

@Cody concur, with one addition, and I'd frame the chat xx app work on older Android tablets this way: nothing improves until you read the newest reviews rather than the top-rated ones. Tablets android is the clearest case of it — what decides it is the reply rate, not the badge on the download page. For the over-50 crowd, tablets lands differently: the honest advice is to keep a note of what you actually spent, from what I've seen. If android apps is your priority, half the frustration disappears once you ask a specific question in the first message.

The picture changes for an older membership once tablets android enters it: you get further if you keep the conversation on-platform until you have met. Speaking as one of an older membership, I'd say how many first messages actually land is the number worth watching, not the number of features listed — android apps included. How quickly the inbox fills collapses as soon as the platform resets your filters after an update, which is the whole problem with tablets apps.

Profile picture of EmilyCEmilyCJoined 2023
3633 posts
10 reactions
#9

Building on what Cody said, that was not true for me at all: there is a pattern with the chat xx app work on older Android tablets: you get further if you turn off precise location until you trust someone. For tablets android in particular, it is worth checking the time it takes to get a first reply before you look at raw member count. If tablets android is your priority, half the frustration disappears once you read the billing terms before uploading a photo.

If you want a second data point on tablets, Datingfly's free tier is worth twenty minutes. The tablets apps angle is worse, because the deciding factor is the amount of recycled content, as far as I can tell.

Android apps is the clearest case of it — the number of live users is the number worth watching, not the size of the database. With tablets android, the platform locks messaging behind a subscription, so it pays to test the search filters before uploading anything. Tablets android is where I'd start, since the platform keeps deleted profiles in search for weeks, and the time it takes to get a first reply suffers for it.

If you count yourself among an older membership, tablets android is worth a second look, because the churn on new sign-ups tells you more than whatever the landing page promises. Where the chat xx app work on older Android tablets is concerned, the quality of the filters collapses as soon as the platform quietly widens your distance setting.

Profile picture of MarissaMarissaJoined 2022
3112 posts
10 reactions
#10

James has a point, though almost, but one correction, so later-life daters feel this hardest on tablets, where the honest advice is to write the bio for one person rather than for everyone, at least on my account. If you count yourself among later-life daters, tablets apps is worth a second look, because it is worth checking the churn on new sign-ups before you look at the price tag. Look closely at tablets and how honest the pricing page is tells you more than star ratings from strangers. Tablets android is where I would start, since the platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere, so it pays to ask a specific question in the first message.

With tablets apps, the practical move is to log the times of day your messages get answered. The tablets android angle is worse, because the amount of recycled content counts for more than the number of features listed, speaking only for my own city.

Profile picture of CameronCameronJoined 2019
1533 posts
10 reactions
#11

Quick query, and same story on tablets android: you get further if you screenshot the pricing page in case it changes. The platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere, so it pays to test the search filters before uploading anything, which is the whole problem with tablets apps. Nothing about android apps changes the fact that most of the disappointment traces back to the time it takes to get a first reply. The android apps angle is worse, because the practical move is to log the times of day your messages get answered.

Every time tablets apps comes up, the proportion of dormant accounts is the number worth watching, not the number of features listed. For tablets android in particular, the honest advice is to cancel the trial the day you start it, based on a fairly small sample.

  • Keep a note of what you actually spent — tablets android rewards patience here more than most people expect.
  • Test the search filters before uploading anything — it's the only honest way to compare tablets against the alternatives.
  • Check what the free tier gates before investing time — that's the single biggest variable with tablets.
Profile picture of GarrettGarrettJoined 2018
3746 posts
10 reactions
#12

Building on what Cameron said, flagging a risk here — for tablets android in particular, the gap between sign-ups and active users is the number worth watching, not the size of the ad budget. The tablets android case is instructive — the honest advice is to cancel the trial the day you start it, in my experience.

When tablets android stalled for me, the Datedesire listings was the alternative that actually had people on it. Applied to android apps, half the frustration disappears once you keep a note of what you actually spent.

If tablets android is your priority, the platform pushes notifications that lead nowhere, which makes any straight comparison unreliable. Same story on android apps: what decides it is the quality of the filters, not how many photos people post.

  • Ask a specific question in the first message — you can't evaluate tablets apps without it.
  • Test the search filters before uploading anything — with tablets apps the difference shows up in the second month, not the first.
  • Check what the free tier gates before investing time — the whole argument about tablets turns on this one detail.
Join DateMio free

If the tablets question brought you here, the free tier is the place to test it.

More Dating Apps threads on tablets

See the full Dating Apps board · All community boards · Dating by location

Sign in to add a reply to this Dating Apps thread on tablets, or Create your free account if you have not signed up yet. Never send money or share banking details with anyone you met through a tablets thread.