Are there any free lds dating sites for Mormons?

So I've been down this rabbit hole for a while now and honestly I'm exhausted. Every site you sign up for has the same play—lure you in with "free" access, then lock everything interesting behind a premium wall. I've wasted more money than I care to admit trying to find something that actually delivers.

The trial cancellation thing is especially frustrating. You forget by one day and suddenly there's a charge on your card you didn't see coming. Has anyone actually gotten money back from these places? I filed a dispute with my bank once and it worked, but I'm not sure if that's the standard route.

Would love to hear from people who've found workarounds or platforms that are genuinely upfront about pricing. Drop your experiences below.

Okay, going to actually put effort into answering this one because it comes up all the time and the answers are usually unhelpful.

• Free doesn't always mean free—look for trial periods with auto-renewal
• Profile verification reduces bot ratios significantly
• Smaller communities often have better engagement than huge platforms
• Privacy settings matter—always check what's public by default
• Response rate > profile count: 50 active users beats 50,000 ghosts

That's the honest picture as I see it. Things shift but the fundamentals stay pretty consistent.

I'll give you the honest breakdown since there's a lot of marketing noise around this topic:

• Older, established platforms have larger user bases but more bots
• Newer platforms have smaller but often more engaged communities
• Location matters a lot—what works in major cities may be dead in smaller towns
• The gender ratio varies wildly and directly affects your experience
• Premium tiers are worth it when the free tier actually shows you real users

Hopefully some of this is useful. Happy to answer follow-ups.

This is something I've thought about a lot. Let me lay out a more complete picture.

• Older, established platforms have larger user bases but more bots
• Newer platforms have smaller but often more engaged communities
• Location matters a lot—what works in major cities may be dead in smaller towns
• The gender ratio varies wildly and directly affects your experience
• Premium tiers are worth it when the free tier actually shows you real users

Hopefully some of this is useful. Happy to answer follow-ups.

Hot take: the smaller, less-hyped platforms almost always have better engagement ratios than the big names. Less noise.

Great thread. This is exactly the kind of honest discussion that's missing from most review sites.

Came across Datescout recently and it's been decent—worth a look.

Did a deep dive into this a few months back, here's what I found:

Video verification before meeting anyone in person is non-negotiable at this point. Ten minutes on a live call tells you more than a week of texting.

A few others worth knowing about if you haven't come across them yet: datenest.site, luvdate.site, flurrydate.online. Each has a different strength so it's worth checking which fits your situation.

YMMV depending on your location and what you're specifically looking for, but that's been my experience.

This is something I've thought about a lot. Let me lay out a more complete picture.

• Free doesn't always mean free—look for trial periods with auto-renewal
• Profile verification reduces bot ratios significantly
• Smaller communities often have better engagement than huge platforms
• Privacy settings matter—always check what's public by default
• Response rate > profile count: 50 active users beats 50,000 ghosts

Also worth having in your toolkit: datedesire.online for one type of thing and datewander.site for another—they're not identical and knowing the difference saves you from frustration.

That's the honest picture as I see it. Things shift but the fundamentals stay pretty consistent.

Speaking from experience on this one:

Profile quality matters more than most people think. A well-written bio with specific details about what you're looking for does better than a generic one even with worse photos.

That's my take anyway—curious if others have had different results.

Did a deep dive into this a few months back, here's what I found:

The gender ratio problem is real on most platforms. Apps that have done something creative about it tend to have better communities overall.

One thing worth mentioning is Datenest—it has a different approach to matching that I think deserves more attention. The interface is cleaner than most and it doesn't bury everything behind a hard paywall immediately.

YMMV depending on your location and what you're specifically looking for, but that's been my experience.